Designing, Testing, and Optimizing the Laser‐cut Foil X‐pinch and Benchmarking it against Wire and Hybrid X‐pinches
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations bannerUC San Diego

Designing, Testing, and Optimizing the Laser‐cut Foil X‐pinch and Benchmarking it against Wire and Hybrid X‐pinches

Abstract

Wire X-pinches have been comprehensively studied for nearly four decades as a fast (~1 ns Full-Width Half-Max: FWHM), small (~1\textmu m) X-ray source in pulsed-power experiments. Room for improvement to this array remains though, including reducing variability in source timing, size, quantity, and flux, and the presence of strong electron beam emission post-pinch that tends to doubly expose any acquired radiograph. Many of these limitations can be reduced by optimal mass-matching of the target X to the current driver in use and a reliable cross-point geometry.Addressing these two parameters, we developed a new X-pinch, and tested in on the 200kA, 150ns rise-time GenASIS driver at UC San Diego. This new X is cut from thin metallic foils using a precision laser-cutting facility which can fabricate virtually any cross-sectional mass or crosspoint configuration. The first laser-cut foil X-pinch (LCXP) experiments used Ta, and demonstrated comparable evolution and equal or superior X-ray source parameters to comparably massed W wire X-pinches (WXPs), despite markedly different initial geometry (ie a square or trapezoidal crosspoint cross-section). Subsequent Cu LCXP experiments showed that the X-ray pulse from these targets was confined to a ~2ns period in contrast with the resolvable second pulse of hard X-ray electron beam emission common in WXPs. However, spectroscopic data showed evidence of a beam source co-located with the $\geq$10% solid density, ~1keV hot pinch source. Another promising X-pinch configuration (developed at Cornell University), the hybrid X-pinch (HXP), which consists of two conical electrodes 1-3mm apart bridged by a thin wire or capillary, demonstrated predominantly single source X-pinches and less hard X-ray emission than found in WXPs. To compare all three aforementioned X-pinch configurations–wire, hybrid, and laser-cut foils–we conducted an in-depth performance study of these X’s on the GenASIS driver, representing the first time all three configurations were compared on a single platform. All configurations produced short (~$1ns FWHM), small ($\leq$5\textmu m, both diagnostically limited), soft (Cu L-shell, ~1keV) X-ray sources with comparable peak fluxes, while the thermal K-shell flux increased from hybrid to wire to foil X-pinches. Ultimately, each array possesses benefits and drawbacks which are detailed herein.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View