Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC Riverside

UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations bannerUC Riverside

A Renewed Look at the Coseismic Surface Deformation and Fault Slip of the 1994 Northridge Earthquake Using Space Geodesy

Abstract

The January 17, 1994 M6.7 Northridge earthquake occurred in the densely populated suburbs northwest of Los Angeles, California, causing 33 deaths and ~$20 billion in damage. To quantify the influence, in terms of stress changes, of the Northridge event on surrounding faults, detailed knowledge of the location, orientation and amount of fault slip is important. Existing InSAR models of this earthquake typically were developed by fitting the pattern of displacements by trial and error, and were therefore somewhat subjective. In the 15 years since the original studies were published a number of new modeling tools and community data products have been developed that should enable us to produce more detailed, objective and robust results.

We measure the coseismic deformation of this earthquake using InSAR data from the ERS-1 and JERS-1 satellites, combined with GPS measurements (Hudnut et al., 1996) that together show uplift of ~42 cm. Using these data, we first employ a nonlinear inversion to determine the parameters of a best-fitting model using rectangular, uniform slip dislocations. Our best-fitting fault solution contains two faults, a main fault with 2.3 m of slip and a secondary fault to the northwest with 0.8 m.

In detail, however, the deformation pattern of the Northridge event is more complex than can be described by rectangular dislocations. To investigate this, we solve for a detailed slip distribution for the event using a non-planar triangular element fault mesh modified from the SCEC Community Fault Model (Plesch et al.,2007). This model shows a main asperity on a protrusion on the fault, with peak slip of ~2.7m, bounded at its western edge by a geometrical barrier, a steep down-dip parallel lateral ramp in the fault. Secondary slip of about 0.6m to the northwest of this feature is also present. These two slip patches together shows that the geometry of the fault strongly influences the slip pattern of the event.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View