Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCLA School of Law

UCLA Law & Economics Series bannerUCLA

The Free Radicals of Tort

Abstract

Rational and irrational people are typically held to an identical tort standard when it is a question of their own liability. On the other hand, when it is a question of whether someone else has encouraged some dangerous behavior, as under the doctrines of duty and proximate cause, the encouragers will be liable only when the persons were part of a group whose members typically lack rationality. The courts' apparent purpose is to prevent accidents in every way possible even if it means diluting the incentives of irrational people in order to increase the incentives of responsible people to refrain from creating tempting opportunities for them.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View