<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/tc_surveys/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent tc_surveys items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/tc_surveys/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Surveys and Program Evaluations from Outside UCSF</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Results of the California Teens Nicotine and Tobacco&amp;nbsp;Project Online Survey&amp;nbsp;2023</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06g1d0rx</link>
      <description>This report summarizes the main results from the 2023 wave of the Teens, Nicotine, and Tobacco (TNT) Project Online Survey, which was a statewide online survey conducted in California during spring and fall of&amp;nbsp;2023.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06g1d0rx</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chaffee, Benjamin W</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Couch, Elizabeth T</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Fan Cheng, Nancy</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ameli, Nilofaur</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gansky, Stuart A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Results of the California Teens Nicotine and Tobacco Survey 2022</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rs8k7km</link>
      <description>This report summarizes the main results from the 2022&amp;nbsp;wave of the Teens, Nicotine, and Tobacco (TNT) Project Online Survey, which was a statewide online survey conducted in California during spring and fall of&amp;nbsp;2022.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1rs8k7km</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 7 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Chaffee, Benjamin W</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Couch, Elizabeth T</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheng, Nancy Fan</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ameli, Niloufar</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gansky, Stuart A</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic and Health Effects of a State Cigarette Excise Tax Increase in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rz1q2b4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Coalition for a Healthy California is sponsoring a comprehensive statewide ballot initiative to raise the tobacco excise tax by $2.60 per pack of cigarettes in order to provide funding to qualified hospitals for emergency services, nursing education and health insurance to eligible children. This paper uses the best possible science to estimate the effect of a new tax on cigarette consumption, adult and youth smoking rates, tax revenues, and long term health outcomes. The additional tax would raise the average price of cigarettes to $6.55 per pack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rz1q2b4</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Department of Health Services</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Tobacco Control Section</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Going Smoke-free in the Land of Lakes: Law and Politics in Minnesota Smoke-free Campaigns</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26h1647g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Between 2000 and 2006, many Minnesota communities were engaged in protracted campaigns to pass ordinances that regulated smoking.  Challenges were compounded in communities where multiple cities and counties shared regulatory power within what was, for economic purposes, a single population center.  In 2005, ClearWay MinnesotaSM awarded the Public Health Law Center a two-year research grant to study the legal and political obstacles that seven multi-jurisdictional Minnesota regions faced in smoke-free campaigns over this six-year period.  The purpose of our study was to examine the approaches regulatory authorities took in these campaigns; to analyze the significance of legal and political obstacles in obstructing or supporting progress toward smoke-free regulation; and to develop recommendations to help public health advocates, health organizations, policymakers, and legal professionals anticipate, avoid, and address these obstacles.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/26h1647g</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Economic Impact of Secondhand Smoke in Maryland</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r54g3zv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This study calculates the economic costs of exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) in Maryland – for individuals, employers, and society as a whole. The total costs reported in this study for calendar year 2005 are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Costs related to childhood illness and death – $73.8 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Costs related to adult illness and premature death – $523.8 million.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study should be considered as an estimate of the lower limit of the true economic costs due to secondhand smoke in Maryland, for the following reasons:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study documents the costs of specific medical conditions that have been conclusively shown to be causally related to exposure to secondhand smoke.  For children, these conditions include Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) bronchiolitis, otitis media, asthma, and burns. For adults, the conditions are lung cancer, nasal sinus cancer, cervical cancer, heart attacks, arteriosclerosis, stroke, and asthma. There are additional potential health...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5r54g3zv</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hugh Waters</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 18. Character Smoking in Top Box Office Movies</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/51c162f1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A strong body of evidence now links exposure to smoking in movies with adolescent smoking, identifying it as a key risk factor. Given this link, it is important to examine the way movies portray smoking and to monitor how often smoking occurs in movies over time. With support from the National Cancer Institute and the American Legacy Foundation, researchers at Dartmouth Medical School have conducted an extensive content analysis of 1000 movies, the top 100 box office hits each year from 1996-2005. This Legacy First Look Report examines how smokers are portrayed in these movies and describes trends in movie smoking, by movie and by movie character.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Findings&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our data about movie character smoking show: The portrayal of smokers is often unrealistic, with affluent male characters accounting for a much larger proportion of the tobacco users in movies than in the U.S.;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Smokers in movies are rarely portrayed as having a motive for smoking, and smoking status tends...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/51c162f1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Worth, PhD, Keilah A.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jennifer Duke, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sargent, MD, James D.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taking On Goliath - Civil Society's Leadership Role in Tobacco Control</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dc4x4vh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The global tobacco control movement is more than three decades old, but its impact is inconsistent. For every city or nation that takes strong action to reduce tobacco use, there is another where little if anything has been done to help people stop smoking or to establish tobacco control policies opposed by powerful tobacco industries. Tobacco continues to kill and cause debilitating illnesses, severely retarding progress in improving local, national, and global health and economic conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recent data indicate that smoking is the leading cause of deaths from cardiovascular diseases (1.69 million deaths annually), cancer (1.4 million deaths), and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (970,000 deaths). About 1.25 billion people smoke cigarettes, representing more than one-sixth of the Earth’s population. According to reports from the World Cancer Congress and the 13th World Conference on Tobacco OR Health, held in Washington, D.C., in July 2006, if current trends hold,...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3dc4x4vh</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Open Society Institute</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economic and Health Effects of a State Cigarette Excise Tax Increase in California</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pq0j4bz</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Coalition for a Healthy California is sponsoring a comprehensive statewide ballot initiative to raise the tobacco excise tax by $2.60 per pack of cigarettes in order to provide funding to qualified hospitals for emergency services, nursing education, and health insurance to eligible children.  This paper uses the best possible science to estimate the effect of a new tax on cigarette comsuption, adult and youth smoking rates, tax revenues, and long term health outcomes.  The additional tax would raise the average price of cigarettes to $6.55 per pack.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5pq0j4bz</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 8 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Department of Health Services, Tobacco Control Section</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cigarette Purchasing Patterns among New York Smokers: Implications for Health, Price, and Revenue</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8026w9n0</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Executive Summary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Raising the price of cigarettes is one of the most effective interventions to prevent and reduce cigarette use. Local, state, and federal governments can change the price of cigarettes by raising or lowering cigarette excise taxes and by implementing and enforcing minimum price laws. Smokers can also adjust their behavior by choosing discount or “bargain” brands, buying fewer cigarettes, and avoiding paying cigarette taxes by purchasing from retailers that do not levy all applicable state and local taxes, such as Indian reservations and Internet cigarette vendors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Purchasing low price or untaxed cigarettes is common among smokers in New York. The most common source of cigarette tax avoidance in New York is purchasing from Indian reservations, especially in the western areas of the state. This behavior undermines the state’s efforts to prevent and reduce tobacco use. Cigarette tax avoidance not only reduces smokers’ incentives to quit smoking or...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8026w9n0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 9 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>New York State Department of Health</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>(Kevin Davis)</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>(Matthew Farrelly)</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>(Qiang Li)</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>(Andrew Hyland)</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Indiana</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8s15p5cs</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Indiana and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Indiana evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8s15p5cs</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. New Mexico</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7cb0w8tb</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with New Mexico and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting New Mexico evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7cb0w8tb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Michigan</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6fs8f7p4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Michigan and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Michigan evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6fs8f7p4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Florida</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6788k9c5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Florida and sever other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control conrol funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Florida evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6788k9c5</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Nebraska</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4zf1994v</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Nebraska and sever other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control conrol funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project Leap and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Nebraska evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4zf1994v</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Minnesota</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k16293f</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Minnesota and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Minnesota evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2k16293f</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. North Carolina</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z84q0tp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with North Carolina and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting North Carolina evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z84q0tp</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Center for Tobacco Policy Research at Saint Louis University. Project LEAP. Oregon</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z29t8zp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2004, The Center for Tobacco Policy Research (CTPR) partnered with Oregon and several other states to evaluate how unstable state financial climates were affecting state tobacco control funding reductions. Using both quantitative methodologies, information was collected from the eight state tobacco control programs on topics such as state financial and political climates, partner relationships, program capacity, and the effects of funding reductions on program implementation. This report provides an overview of project LEAP and summary highlights from the series of four reports presenting Oregon evaluation results.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z29t8zp</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jenine Harris</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 11. Youth Tobacco Cessation. Results from the 2000 national youth tobacco survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9qz7z3qb</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Using information from a national youth tobacco survey, this report explores tobacco cessation among yoth aged 12 to 19. It describes current smoking behavior, cessation attempts, and factors that influence youth quitting behavior. This report is based on data from the 2000 National Youth Tobacco Survey.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9qz7z3qb</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Debra Holden, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lisa Hund, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Julia M. Gable, MS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Paul Mowery, MS</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Policy Report 3, Public Opnion on Strategies to Reduce Youth Exposure to Smoking in the Movies. Results from the American Smoking and Health Survey.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dg0p7jd</link>
      <description>American Legacy Foundation. Policy Report 3, Public Opnion on Strategies to Reduce Youth Exposure to Smoking in the Movies. Results from the American Smoking and Health Survey.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dg0p7jd</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl G. Healton, DrPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ella Watson-Stryker, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jennifer Duke, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Stanton Glantz, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Andrew Jessup</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Susan Murchie, MA</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Legacy First Look Report 5. Youth Access to Cigarettes: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fr065gc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this report is to examine the issue of youth access to cigarettes using data from the 1999 Natiional Youth Tobacco Survey. Yout access to cigarettes is described in terms of youth's usual sources of cigarettes, the prices they pay, and the restrictions they encounter when trying to purchase cigarettes. This report focues on four general questions with the following main findings: 1)How do youth obtain cigarettes? 2)Where do youth go to purchase cigarettes? 3)What do youth pay for pack of cigarettes?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fr065gc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jeanne S Ringel, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jeffrey Wasserman, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, Legacy First Look Report 6. Youth Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7db25677</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report describes the patterns of Environmental Tobacco Smoke exposure among youth primarily at home but also in other settings. We also consider youth's perceptions of the dangers of ETS and parental influence on youth smoking behavior. We then apply prevalence rates to population estimates in order to estimate the number of youth ages 12 to 18 exposed to ETS in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7db25677</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mattew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Joy Chen, MSPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kristin Y. Thomas, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl G. Healton, DrPH</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Tobacco as a Social Justice Issue. Remarks of Dr. Cheryl Healton</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/72h608mq</link>
      <description>American Legacy Foundation. Tobacco as a Social Justice Issue. Remarks of Dr. Cheryl Healton</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/72h608mq</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl G. Healton, DrPH</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 12. Exposure to Pro-tobacco Messages among Teens and Young Adults</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6rx0f6q5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The purpose fo this report is to summarize awareness of and receptivity to pro-tobacco marketing influences from three national samples of teens and young adults following the MSA. The report addresses 4 key research questions. 1)How frequently are young teens (age 12 to 14), older teens (aged 15 to 17), and young adults (age 18 to 24) exposed to pro-tobacco marketing? 2)How frequently are teens and young adults exposed to smoking portrayals in television and films? 3)Have reports of exposure to pro-tobacco marketing among teens and young adults changed between winter 1999-20000, fall 2000, and spring 2001? 4)How does exposure to pro-tobacco marketing differ by race/ethnicity, gender and smoking status?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6rx0f6q5</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jeff Niederdeppe, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Drew Lindsey, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maria E. Girlando, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Alec Ulasevich, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 14</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pc7783q</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the United States, more than 4 million youth between the ages of 12 and 17 are exposed to secondhand smoke in the home. The vast majority of this exposure is a result of parental smoking in the home. This report presents information about youth exposure to secondhand smoke, with special focus on exposure in the home. It explores prevalence of household restrictions on smoking, which can reduce secondhand smoke exposure. Finally, the report takes a brief look at what adults know about the effect of secondhand smoke on children.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pc7783q</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kristen McCausland</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kristin Thomas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ella Watson-Stryker</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James Xiao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jane Allen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Matthew Farrelly</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Donna Vallone</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl Healton</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Policy Report 2, Secondhand Smoke Tearing Families Apart. The Health and Economic Burden of Smoking on Children</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6h10892t</link>
      <description>American Legacy Foundation. Policy Report 2, Secondhand Smoke Tearing Families Apart. The Health and Economic Burden of Smoking on Children</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6h10892t</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl Healton</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>M. Lyndon Haviland, DrPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jane A. Allen, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maria E. Girlando, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lisa Hund, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Andrew Jessup</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James M. Lightwood</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Brett loomis, MS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Nathan Mann, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Susan Murchie, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kristin Thomas, MSPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Donna M. Vallone, PhD, MPH</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, Using Multiple Strategies in Tobacco Use Prevention Education</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk9b677</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report focuses the extent to which four types of prevention education strategies measured in the 2000 National Youth Tobacco Survey are being impplemented in schools. It assess whether students believe that tobacco use prevention education programs contribute to their decision not to smoke. The report also compares attitudes and beliefs about smoking among those students who receive fewer smoking prevention education strategies to those who receive more. Furthermore, it determines association between smoking status and receipt of multiple prevention education strategies. Results from the 2000 NYTS suggest that multistrategy prevention education may be effective in reinforcing anitobacco attitudes and curbing youth smoking. Research supports implementation of multistrategy prevention programs because they can result in increased knowledge about tobacco use, positive attitutes about being a non-smoker, and overall decreased amounts of youth smoking.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6bk9b677</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Dana L. Wenter, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Sondra Blackwell, MEd</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kevin C. Davis, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, Legacy First Look Report 7. Cigarettte Smoking AMong Youth: Results from the 2000 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t79k388</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This survey was designed to provide nationally representative estimates of smoking behaviors, attitutes, and influences among African-American, Hispanic, and White middle and high school students. The prevalence youth smoking from this survey was reported in Legacy First Look Report 1, Cigarettee Smoking Among Youth: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey. In Spring 2000, the NYTS was repeated to complement the National Youth Risk Behavior Surveys that are conducted in the spring of odd years. Th sample size of the 2000 NYTS was increased to provide a nationally representative sample of Asian-Americans in middle and high school. The current report updated the findings from the 1999 NYTS focusing on the prevalence and intensity of youth smoking behavior and the characteristics of cigarettes smoked by middle and high school students.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t79k388</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mattew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>My-Charllins Vilsaint, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Drew Lindsey, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kristin Y. Thomas, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Peter Messeri, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Guide to Deciphering the Internal Codes Used by the Tobacco Industry</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47k0h6q1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Although previous research provides examples of the tobacco industry's internal coded, acronyms and abbreviations, no studies to date have undertaken a systematic review of this secretive internal jargon. In this study, we review tobacco industry documents to identify industry lists of codes and their definitions, types of codes, and patterns used for coding as well as specific codes related to product research. These findings are organized to assist other researchers in finding and decoding documents relevant to their own particular topics of interest. Likewise, we encourage documentresearchers to consider the use of code patterns, particularly those that are unique specific manufacturers, departments, project areas or types of research. We conclude that effective document research requires the development of coherent strategies to identify and decifer the coded and terminology used internally and that sharing this information will facilitate and expedite future research.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47k0h6q1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Doris Cullen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Geoffrey Ferris Wayne</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gregory N. Connolly</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Howard Koh</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 13. Cigarette Smoking among Youth. Results from the 2002 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41n8d2x8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report based on the 2002 NYTS, preesnts rates of ever, current, and frequent smoking; ever smoking daily; number of cigarettes smoked; cigarette type and brand preferences; and use of menthol cigarettes. This report also shows the change in current smoking from 2000 to 2002. Tobacco use has declined since 2000 among high school students. In 2000, 28 percent of high school students in the United States were current smokers, compared with 23 percent in 2002. Among middle school students, the trend is less encouraging; smoking remained relatively stable, with rates of use at 11 percent in 2000 and 10 percent in 2002. Some of the factors believed to be associated with the decline in smoking among high school students are state and national media campaignsm such as the national truth campaign; increased cigarette prices; restrictions on tobacco advertising; and smoke-free laws and policies. It is unclear why middle school smoking rates remain unchanged&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41n8d2x8</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>My-Charllins Vilsaint, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James Xiao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kevin Davis</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Donna Vallone</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jane Allen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Andrew Jessup</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Susan Murchie</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 15. Beyond Cigarettes: The Use of Other Tobacco Products. Results from the 2002 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nz1n11r</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Although cigarette smoking accounts for the majority of youth tobacco use, it is important to monitor use of other tobacco products. These other products - cigars, smokeless tobacco, bidis, kreteks, and pipes - pose many of the same health risks as cigarettes and may present different dangers. For example, use of smokeless tobacco is associated with increased risk of cancer of the mouth, lips, and tongue, and little is known about the differential health effects of smoking bidis, whcih are unfiltered, leaf-wrapped cigarettes from india. Tracking teen use of these other tobacco products makes possible to identify emerging trends, which can be addressed through youth tobacco prevention education and cessation programs.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nz1n11r</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kristen McCauland</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James Xiao</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Molly Green</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jane Allen</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ella Watson-Stryker</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Donna Vallone</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl Healton</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Saving Lives, Saving Money: Why States Should Invest in a Tobacco-Free Future.</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/259671th</link>
      <description>American Legacy Foundation. Saving Lives, Saving Money: Why States Should Invest in a Tobacco-Free Future.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/259671th</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Paul G. Billings</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Frank Chaloupka</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Matthrew Farrelly</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Eric N. Lindblom</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Thomas Novotny</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, Getting to the Truth: Assessing Youths' Reactions to the truth and "think. Don't Smoke" Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/249139nm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In February 2000, the American Legacy Foundation launched a national media campaign know as truth to counter the influence of tobacco marketing and imagery targeting youths. The primary target audience for the truth campaign is 12 to 17 year old youths who are susceptible or open to smoking. The purpose of this report is to summarize awareness of tobacco countermarketing and reactions to truth and TDS campaign messages. In addition, we examine how awareness of and and reaction to these messages varies by gender, race/ethnicity, and stage of smoking (e.g., nonsmoker, smoker) This report focuses on several key questions: 1)What health and safety messages have youths seen or hear on TV, radio, billboards, or in magazines in the past months? 2)Where are youths seeing and/or hearing tobacco countermarketing messages? 3)How has overall awareness of countermarketing campaigns changed since the launch of the truth campaign? 4)What specific tobacco countermarketing television ads have...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/249139nm</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Matthew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Kevin C. Davis, MA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jared M. Yarsevich, MSc</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>M. Lyndon Haviland, DrPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James Hersey, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maria E. Girlando, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cheryl G. Healton, DrPH</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, The relationship between Cigarette Use and Other Tobacco Products. Results from The 2000 National Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1p61x928</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report presents data from the 2000 NYTS that describe the use of tobacco products, other than cigarettes, among a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students. The report also examines the relationship between cigarette use and the use of other tobacco products. All of the analyses in the report are strtified by the demographic characteristics, such as grade level, gender, and race/ethnicity. Further, the report compares the findings from the 2000 NYTS with findings from the 1999 NYTS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1p61x928</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jeanne S Ringel, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jeffrey Wasserman, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation, Legacy First Look Report 4. The Relationship Between Cigarette Use and Other Tobacco Products: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kz319bj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report presents data from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS) that describes the use of tobacco products, other than cigarettes, among a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students. The report also examines the relationship between cigarette use and the use of other tobacco products. Tobacco products categorized as "other" than cigarettes that are discussed in this report include smokeless tobacco, cigars, pipes, bidis, and kreteks.The two central questions and main findings discussed in the reports are: 1)What is the prevalence of the use of othertobacco products among youth, and 2)What is the relationship between the use of cigarettes and the use of other tobacco products.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6kz319bj</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Jeanne S Ringel, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Jeffrey Wasserman, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Legacy First Look Report 2. What Youth Think About Smoking: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1sw6s3kk</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report explores attitudinal and normative factors that may influence adolescent intent to use or not use tobacco, as well as how these factors vary by grade, gender, and race/ethnicity. It describes developmental increases in the social appeal and acceptance of tobacco during the course of adolescence that deserve attention in efforts at tobacco prevention and control.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1sw6s3kk</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>W. Douglas Evans, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>James Hersey, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Alec Ulasevich, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Anne Powers, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Effect of the New York State Cigarette Fire Safety Standard on Ignition Propensity, Smoke Toxicity and the Consumer market</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0mg5v7cp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report examines New York's initial experience implementing fire safety standards for cigarettes. This study provided the first assessment of the ability of manufacturers to produce cigarettes that reduce ignition propensity, while maintaining price and consumer acceptability. The study also measures a number known toxic compound s commonly found in cigarettes to determine if there are substantial differences in their levels compared to Mssachussetts cigarettes. The study compares laboratory testing of RIP and the level of nineteen known toxic compounds for the same four cigarette brands sold in New York and Massachussetts. The study further examines measures of tax revenue, pricing, and brand availability to assess the effects of fire safety standards on the consumer market.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0mg5v7cp</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hillel R. Alpert</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Carrie Carpenter</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Gregory N. Connolly</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Vaughan Rees</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Geoffrey Ferris Wayne</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>American Legacy Foundation. Legacy First Look Report 1. Cigarette Smoking Among Youth: Results from the 1999 National Youth Tobacco Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06k0m740</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this report is to provide detailed information on cigarette smoking among youth, including the prevalence and intensity of smoking behavior as well as the characteristics of the cigarettes smoked by middle and high school students. It is the first in a series of reports from the American Lagacy Foundation (Legacy) that will summarize findings from the NYTs and other surveys and studies conducted by Legacy&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06k0m740</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mattew C. Farrelly, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Dorothy L. Faulkner, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Paul Mowery, MS</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant, Part C: Public Comments and ARB/OEHHA Staff Responses</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wd3q1n1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report is part of a comprehensive assessment of the effects of environmental tobacco smoke (secondhand smoke) as of mid-2005 produced by the California Air Resources Board and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as part of the process of identifying ETS as a toxic air contaminant.  Part C contains all the public comments and responses to these comments by the Air Resources Board and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main body of the report (Parts A and B) is available at  http://repositories.cdlib.org/tc/surveys/CALEPA2005/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wd3q1n1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proposed Identification of Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Toxic Air Contaminant</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hk6960q</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report provides a comprehensive assessment of the effects of environmental tobacco smoke (secondhand smoke) as of mid-2005 produced by the California Air Resources Board and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as part of the process of identifying ETS as a toxic air contaminant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part A of the report includes information about the chemical composition of secondhand smoke and exposure of the public to secondhand smoke, including outdoor exposures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part B of the report includes information on the health effects of secondhand smoke and concludes that the following health effects are causally associated iwth ETS exposure:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Developmental Effects: Fetal growth: Low birth weight and decrease in birth weight, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), Pre-term Delivery&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Respiratory Effects:  Acute lower respiratory tract infections in children (e.g., bronchitis and pneumonia), Asthma induction and exacerbation in children and adults, Chronic respiratory...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hk6960q</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>California Environmental Protection Agency: Air Resources Board</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Use In California 1990-1991</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9nc0611g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Summary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This report presents data from a survey of cigarette smoking behaviors and attitudes among Californians conducted between June, 1990 and July, 1991.  The prevalence of current smoking among adults in California was 22.2%, with males (25.5%) smoking more than females (19.1%).  This represents a sharp decline in smoking following the increase in the tobacco excise tax and implementation of a comprehensive tobacco control program by the State of California.  The decline in prevalence is on track for reaching the goal of a 75% reduction in smoking prevalence by the year 1999.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Black Californians were more likely to be cigarette smokers than other racial or ethnic groups, and Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander women were less likely to be cigarette smokers.  Smoking prevalence was also lower among those who have completed more years of formal education and among those who were over the age of 65 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Current smoking prevalence among adolescents aged 12-17...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9nc0611g</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>California Department of Health Services</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Westat, Inc.</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Los Angels County Department of Health Services</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Use in California 1992: A Focus on Preventing Uptake in Adolescents</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1qt222wb</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Executive Summary  This report reviews evidence of progress in achieving the goals set for the California Tobacco Control Program that was funded by the voter sponsored Tobacco Tax Initiative (Proposition 99 of 1988).  In addition, this report provides information about influences on adolescent smoking behavior; these data have become available as part of the evaluation of this Program.  Three overall conclusions are presented on the impact of the Tobacco Control Program though 1992 and the major barriers to the Program’s success with adolescents.  These conclusions are followed by summary of the findings for each topic considered in this report.  Detailed analyses of the findings are included in the chapters indicated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1qt222wb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 5 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>California Department of Health Services, Sacramento</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Westat, Inc.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Use in California 1990: A Preliminary Report Documenting the Decline of Tobacco Use</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9ht838kr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Summary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This report presents data on a partial sample of a survey of cigarette smoking behaviors and attitudes among Californians conducted during the summer of 1990.  The prevalence of current smoking among adults in California is 21.2% with males (23.8%) smoking more than females (18.8%).  This represents a sharp decline in smoking following the increase in the tobacco excise tax and implementation of a comprehensive tobacco control program by the State of California, and is on track for reaching the goal of a 75% reduction in smoking prevalence by the year 1999.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Black Californians are more likely to be cigarette smokers than other racial or ethnic groups,  and Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander women are less likely to be cigarette smokers.  Smoking prevalence is also lower among those who have completed more years of formal education and among those who are over the age of 65 years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Current smoking prevalence among adolescents aged 12-17 years is 10.4%;...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9ht838kr</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>California Depratment of Health Services</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Control Successes in California: A Focus on Young People, Results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990-2002</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/949939kv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Executive Summary  The California Tobacco Surveys (CTS), along with other data sources, have helped document the progress and success of over a decade of tobacco control efforts in California.  Some of the most important findings are highlighted below, with reference to Selected Key Findings (KF) appearing on the following pages that provide more detail.  Since young people are the focus of this report, findings pertaining to adolescents and young adults are presented first.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/949939kv</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Use in California An Evaluation of the Tobacco Contol Program, 1989-1993</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/50m471m2</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Progress from 1988 through 1993 1.  Protection of Nonsmokers form Environmental Tobacco Smoke     (ETS) 	(a)  Children at Home: 80% of children younger than 17              years protected by 1993 	(b)  Nonsmokers at Work: 23% decrease in the number of               nonsmokers exposed to ETS during 1990-1993&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2.  Reduction in Smoking Prevalence&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(a) Tobacco consumption declined 27% between 1988 and 1993.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(b)  Smoking prevalence declined 28% from an estimated 26.5% in       1988 to a best estimate of 19.1% in 1993.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(c) The observed decline in consumption and prevalence resulted     from an increase in successful quitting among California      adults.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(d)  No decline in adolescent smoking was observed after 1990.       The Program appears to have halted the increases in       adolescent smoking observed during 1988-1990.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Forecast to Year 1999&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.  As currently implemented, the Tobacco...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/50m471m2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>JP, Pierce</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>N, Evans</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>AJ, Farkas</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>SW, Cavin</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>C, Berry</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>M, Kramer</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>S, Kealey</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>B, Rosbrook</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>W, Choi</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>RM, Kaplan</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Control In California: Who's Winning The War? An Evalution of the Tobacco Control Program, 1989-1996</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/22r9f98f</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Executive Summary&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The California Department of Health Services contracted with the University of California, San Diego, to conduct a series of California Tobacco Surveys and to provide an independent and scientific assessment of the progress of the California Tobacco Control Program.  Any interpretations of data or conclusions expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not represent the views of the State of California.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A primary goal of the Tobacco Control Program is to reduce smoking among California adults and adolescents.  Assessment of Program progress in meeting this goal involves an examination of trends in per capita cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence.  Program effects must be distinguished from differences resulting from changes in the demographic profile of the California population.  Standardized prevalence estimates were more rapid decline in smoking than existed previously or that occurred in the rest of the United States. ...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/22r9f98f</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, Results from the California Tobacco Survey, 1990-1999</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06x3p8qr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Executive Summary:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;During the 1990s in California, smoking behavior and attiudes about smoking have changed, as measured from the California Tobacco Surveys (CTS) and other data sources.  Some of the most important findings from the CTS are highlighted below.  For a more complete summary, see the Key Findings from each chapter of this report, which appear both in this Executive Summary and at the end of each chapter.  Throughout this report, results are given with the margin of error (±95% confidence limits)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Adult Smoking Behavior&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Over the decade, per capita cigarette consumption fell by a factor of 57% in California compared to only 27% in the rest of the United States.  By the end of  1999, Californians consumed only 4.1 packs of cigarettes per person per month, compared to 9.1 in the rest of the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While adult (18+ years) smoking prevalence decreased in the first few years of the decade, after 1994 changes in the prevalence were not statistically...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/06x3p8qr</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of California, San Diego</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Missouri Profile: A review of Missouri's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5366j1nb</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Missouri’s tobacco control program has been greatly challenged by an unsupportive political climate, inadequate program funding, and a state budget deficit. Despite these barriers, the program has benefited from dedicated tobacco control professionals, committed coalitions, and recent efforts in policy change. It is hoped that continued efforts in strengthening community groups and a unified implementation of a strategic plan will help Missouri’s program progress in its efforts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5366j1nb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Quitting Smoking, 1999-2003: Nicotine Addiction in Minnesota</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ck2s8r6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This report describes Minnesotans’ efforts to quit smoking and provides an update to the findings from the 1999 Adult Tobacco Prevalence Survey that were presented in our July 2001 report, Quitting Smoking: Nicotine Addiction in Minnesota. Smokers in Minnesota made substantially more attempts to quit in the year prior to the 2003 Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey than in the year prior to the 1999 Adult Tobacco Prevalence Survey. In addition, more smokers reported an increased readiness to make quit attempts. Most smokers also stated interest in using quitting assistance, which has become widely available to all Minnesotans in the past five years. Interest in stop-smoking medications remained high between 1999 and 2003, while interest increased in the stop-smoking telephone helplines made available in the last five years. Despite the availability of these resources, two-thirds of current smokers with recent quit attempts did not use any form of assistance, pointing to a major...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3ck2s8r6</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Minnesota Department of Health</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>University of Minnesota</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Patterns of Smoking Among Minnesota’s Young Adults</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv1x3wt</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey was conducted between November 2002 and June 2003. Findings are based on interviews with 8,821 adults, including 1,205 young adults between 18 and 24 years of age. The purpose of this report is to draw the attention of policy makers, the medical and public health communities, and the general public to the high smoking rates and somewhat unique smoking patterns among young adults in Minnesota. The unsettled nature of young adult smoking patterns means that there are points at which the community can intervene to prevent the steady escalation of smoking that often occurs during these years. Effective strategies to combat the tobacco industry’s advertising and promotional resources require solid information.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv1x3wt</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 7 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Minnesota Department of Health</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Minnesota Partnership for Action Against Tobacco</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>University of Minnesota</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hawaii Profile : A review of Hawaii 's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1d27f4bk</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dedicated tobacco control partners and a comprehensive program contributed to Hawaii’s tobacco control program experiencing several successes, including the adoption of clean indoor air ordinances in all of the counties and a high cigarette excise tax. State budget shortfalls and prioritization of other issues in the Legislature have been a challenge for the program, but with the leadership of the State Department of Health Tobacco Prevention and Education Program (DOH TPEP) and a coordinated effort among partners, Hawaii’s program will continue to grow and thrive. help finance construction of the new medical school was hurtful to the program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Partners identified the following strengths and challenges of Hawaii’s tobacco control program:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The dedication of the professionals working in tobacco control was viewed as a major strength of the program. Some partners also specifically mentioned the DOH TPEP staff as being highly committed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The ability to sustain...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1d27f4bk</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mississippi Profile : A review of Mississippi's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8jj1n96k</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Dedicated tobacco control partners, adequate funding, and strong leadership from the Partnership for a Healthy Mississippi (The Partnership) contributed to Mississippi turning a two-year pilot project into a model tobacco control program. Effective youth programs, a strong community coalition structure, and a comprehensive approach are just some of the many characteristics that have moved Mississippi to the forefront of tobacco control and have already impacted tobacco use prevalence rates. Despite the challenging political and financial climates, Mississippi continues to improve and expand their program.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8jj1n96k</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Pennsylvania Profile: A review of Pennsylvania's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n89608z</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The tobacco control program in Pennsylvania was well established due to adequate funding, political support from previous Administrations, and dedicated tobacco control professionals across the state. The passage of Act 77 of 2001, allocating all the Master Settlement monies to health initiatives, including tobacco control, provided the foundation to establish a comprehensive program. Tobacco control advocates used the CDC’s Best Practices guidelines to model their program and have developed a statewide monitoring system to track program progress. The program does face several challenges including the uncertainty of future funding due to the state’s budget crisis, a change in administration, and preemption. The significant progress the program has attained should serve as an indicator of the potential successes it will be able to achieve if a supportive environment is maintained.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Partners identified the following strengths and challenges of Pennsylvania’s tobacco control...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7n89608z</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa, BS</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The New York Profile: A review of New York's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8j01x4mr</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Partners identified the following strengths and challenges of New York’s tobacco control program:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The experience and leadership of the DOH TCP Director was a major strength of the program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• Clean indoor air efforts throughout the state were also a strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• Partners were concerned about the security of funding due to the large state and city budget deficits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The highly politicized DOH environment and slow grant process were viewed as barriers to the program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• Little support from state policymakers and the influence of the tobacco industry made implementing a comprehensive program challenging.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8j01x4mr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Michigan Profile: A review of Michigan's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18s0b3qg</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Michigan’s tobacco control program has been greatly challenged by an unsupportive political climate, a state budget deficit, and inadequate program funding. Despite these barriers, the program has benefited from strong tobacco control experience and leadership, a supportive network of tobacco control partners, and recent local clean indoor air efforts. It is hoped that the new Governor and Legislature will provide more support for tobacco control, helping Michigan’s program to progress in its efforts.   Program Strengths &amp;amp; Challenges   Partners identified the following strengths and challenges of Michigan’s tobacco control program:   • Partners described the Tobacco Section staff as very dedicated, knowledgeable, and committed to tobacco control and a major strength of Michigan’s program.   • The statewide coalition, Tobacco Free Michigan Action Coalition, and its members were viewed as strengths.   • A few partners identified local coalitions and their grassroots efforts...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18s0b3qg</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Hepp, Lisa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Oklahoma Profile: A review of Oklahoma's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vt7h2gp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Oklahoma’s tobacco control program has made progress despite the challenges of inadequate program funding, an unsupportive political climate, and the pro-tobacco norm of its citizens. They have benefited from strong tobacco control leadership, a supportive network of tobacco control partners, and advances in secondhand smoke policy. These characteristics along with the strong commitment of the tobacco control community will continue to improve and expand Oklahoma’s tobacco control efforts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fiscal year 02, Oklahoma dedicated approximately $3.8 million ($1.10 per capita) to tobacco control, meeting 17% of CDC’s lower funding estimate. Community programs received nearly half of the funding, while enforcement and chronic disease programs received no funding from the tobacco control program. The establishment of the Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust Fund (Trust) and securing funding from other sources, such as the CDC and the American Legacy Foundation, were viewed as...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vt7h2gp</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Tobacco Industry Documents: An Introductory Handbook and Resource Guide for Researchers</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5c82b367</link>
      <description>The Tobacco Industry Documents: An Introductory Handbook and Resource Guide for Researchers</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5c82b367</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>MacKenzie, Ross</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Collin, Jeff</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Lee, Kelley</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Wyoming Profile: A review of Wyoming's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sx457m1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wyoming’s strong belief of individualism and its pro-tobacco cowboy culture posed significant challenges to Wyoming’s tobacco control program in 2002. Despite the challenges, the tobacco control partners were able to continue to improve their program. They have benefited from the tobacco control network’s strong commitment and enthusiasm and a primary focus on implementing programs in communities across the state.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Partners identified the following strengths and challenges of Wyoming’s tobacco control program:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The focus on supporting and expanding community programs by the DOH TPCP was considered a major strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The commitment and enthusiasm of the tobacco control partners was also a major strength.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• A lack of support from the DOH Substance Abuse Division for tobacco control was a challenge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• The individualistic Wyoming culture made tobacco control efforts difficult.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• Inadequate funding, a lack of support from policymakers, and the...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sx457m1</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Indiana Profile : A review of Indiana's tobacco prevention and control program</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36w8j7ct</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Center for Tobacco Policy Research at the Saint Louis University Prevention Research Center is conducting a three-year project examining the current status of 12-15 state tobacco control programs. The project aims to: 1) develop a comprehensive picture of a state’s tobacco control program to be used as a resource for tobacco control agencies and policymakers; 2) examine the effects of political, organizational, and financial factors on state tobacco control programs; and 3) learn how the states are using the CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs. This Profile has been developed as a resource for tobacco control partners and policymakers to use in their planning and advocacy efforts. The Indiana Profile presents both quantitative and qualitative results collected over a two-month period, beginning in July 2002.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/36w8j7ct</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 5 May 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Herbers, Stephanie, BA</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Washington Profile: A review of Washington's tobacco prevention and control program June 2002</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5db2c577</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;“Creating a sustainable program for long-term success” was the focus of Washington’s 2000 strategic plan. In 2002, this theme was still evident. While Washington was faced with some difficult challenges, the foundation had been laid to continue to improve and expand its tobacco control program. The program benefited from a supportive leadership, ample funding, a health conscious public, and an improving tobacco control network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For this evaluation, preventing youth initiation and promoting cessation were identified as the top two program goals for FY 2002. Partners agreed with these priorities, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating to the Legislature that the program was affecting prevalence rates. Minor changes to the list were suggested: broadening the definition of youth to include 18-24 year olds due to the targeting of this group by the tobacco industry; and including cessation for pregnant women as a sub-goal of promoting cessation. The statewide quit line...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5db2c577</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Mueller, Nancy, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Krauss, Melissa, MPH</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Luke, Douglas, PhD</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smoking in America: 35 Years after the Surgeon General's Report: A Report on the 2000 National Social Climate Survey</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/69n029ph</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General formally announced the health risks of tobacco, thereby providing the impetus for one of the most intensive public health interventions in the history of the United States. Spanning several decades, the tobacco control movement has developed an increasingly effective series of social programs and policies designed to encourage nonsmoking and protect nonsmokers from environmental tobacco smoke. In the years following the initiation of the tobacco control movement, the percentage of current cigarette smokers in the American adult population has decreased dramatically from 42.2 percent in 1965 to 22.7 percent in 1999. This decrease translates into about 40 million fewer adult smokers in the United States today than had the rate remained at 42.2 percent. As the Office of Smoking and Health of the CDC notes, “This achievement has few parallels in the history of public health. It was accomplished despite the addictive nature of tobacco and the powerful...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/69n029ph</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>McMillen, Robert C, PhD</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Ritchie, Liesel A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Frese, Wolfgang</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Cosby, Arthur G.</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tobacco Attitudes and Media Survey 2002 [in Delaware]</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gd607qd</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Tobacco Attitudes and Media Survey was conducted to assess the degree to which the current media program was reaching adult Delawareans. While awareness doesn’t necessarily translate into action, it is a necessary first step. The program is primarily focused on promoting awareness of the dangers of second-hand smoke and the availability of the Delaware Quitline. The survey was used to assess the visibility of the media campaign and to learn how people obtain information about health issues and services. Finally, the reaction of respondents to tobacco advertisements was addressed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5gd607qd</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 1 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Ratledge, Edward C</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Report on Analytic Methods and Approaches Used in the 1999 California Tobacco Survey Analysis : vol 1, Data Collection Methodology</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66p0f8t1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The 1999 California Tobacco Surveys (CTS) were the fifth in a series of cross-sectional studies to collect information about tobacco use and behaviors among California adults and teenagers. These surveys were sponsored by the California Department of Health Services (CDHS) under a contract with the University of California at San Diego (UCSD), and a subcontract with Westat, Inc. in Rockville, Maryland. Westat also conducted the 1990, 1992, 1993, and 1996 surveys. The 1999 CTS began in August 1999, and they were completed in December 1999. The objective of these surveys was to collect representative statewide data on cigarette smoking behavior, attitudes towards smoking, media exposure to smoking, and use of tobacco products other than cigarettes. These data are used by the California Department of Health Services to plan and assess the effectiveness of smoking cessation strategies initiated under Proposition 99. This report discusses the methodology used to conduct the 1999 CTS.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/66p0f8t1</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gilpin, Elizabeth</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Report on Analytic Methods and Approaches Used in the 1999 California Tobacco Survey Analysis :  vol 3 Methods Used for Final Report, The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, 1989-1999</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fr885k4</link>
      <description>Technical Report on Analytic Methods and Approaches Used in the 1999 California Tobacco Survey Analysis :  vol 3 Methods Used for Final Report, The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, 1989-1999</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fr885k4</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gilpin, Elizabeth A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Emery, Sherry</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Berry, Charles</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technical Report on Analytic Methods and Approaches Used in the 1999 California Tobacco Survey Analysis : VOLUME 2, Statistical Methodology, Public Use Data File Documentation, Individual Item Responses</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f34d2d9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For the 1999 California Tobacco Surveys (CTS), Westat performed statistical tasks that included sample selection, weighting, and data collection. This volume of the report contains a description of the methodology used by Westat to do sample selection, weighting, and develop replicate weights for variance estimation purposes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3f34d2d9</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Gilpin, Elizabeth A</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Pierce, John P</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Berry, Charles C</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>White, Martha M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Maklan, David M</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Croos, Joe</name>
      </author>
      <author>
        <name>Aiken, Miriam</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
