<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://escholarship.org/uc/hcs_WorkingPapers/rss"/>
    <ttl>720</ttl>
    <title>Recent hcs_WorkingPapers items</title>
    <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/hcs_WorkingPapers/rss</link>
    <description>Recent eScholarship items from Lake Arrowhead Conference, 2005</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 05:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>On a Hierarchically Decomposed Agent</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bh3m6vp</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The present manuscript is intended to informally elucidate my ideas on a general theory of collective behavior and structure formation, with a resulting architecture that can be broadly applied. The proposed model represents a decomposition of intent, based on the idea that an agent’s behavior, whether it represents an individual or a group, can be seen as an emergent property of a collection of intertwined aims and constraints. I consider a disentangled agent that is formed by multiple and relatively independent components. Part of the resulting agent’s task is to present alternatives, or ‘fields of action’ to its component selves. Correspondingly, the composed agent is itself constrained by a field of action that the superstructure to which it belongs presents. The superstructure of agents possesses a certain amount of cohesion, and can thus be ascribed agency and modeled as a unit; its independent parts could be consciously or evolutionally constructed and aligned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bh3m6vp</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Suarez, E. Dante</name>
      </author>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Culture, Cultural Models, and the Division of Labor</title>
      <link>https://escholarship.org/uc/item/57q335z4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;“Cultural Models” (CM)  is a term that has come to apply to culturally standardized and shared/distributed  cognitive structures for explaining or structuring action.  They contrast with more cultural conceptual systems (such  as kinship or ethnobiological terminological systems) and more general procedures analyzing and imposing initial  structure on new problems.  They are functionally a little like Schank and Abelson’s “scripts”.  CMs combine  motives, emotions, goals, mechanisms, classificatory information, etc.--in each case, perhaps, cross-linking to  separate cognitive structures within which these separate entities are organized, structured, and classified--into  possible actions.  CMs can be used by individual actors to generate behavior--often after some consideration of the  downstream implications of the choice of one model over another--but are not themselves the individual internal  cognitive schemas that actually generate behavior. Different CMs are cross-linked...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://escholarship.org/uc/item/57q335z4</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>
        <name>Kronenfeld, David B</name>
      </author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
